1996-02-24 Richard Moore @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 Sender: •••@••.••• (Marilyn Davis) Subject: CR CRISIS/24 Hours of Democracy Thank you, Richard, for this: > The original purpose of cyber-rights was to be a Campaign — to build a > constituency both on and off the net that understands the democracy-aspect > of the cyberspace … Read more…
1996-02-24 Richard Moore @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 Sender: •••@••.••• Subject: Re: cr> CRISIS in cyber-rights (PLEASE READ) In a message dated 96-02-23 06:26:21 EST, you write: >The original purpose of cyber-rights was to be a Campaign — to build a…………… Hmmmmm, having been a certified first-class lurker for the past 6 or 7 … Read more…
1996-02-24 Richard Moore @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 Sender: Brennon Martin <•••@••.•••> Subject: Re: cr> IP: A Kick in the Flat-Fee Access by Meeks Hi, See comments below. ~–<snip of quoted material>–~ > Fighting this bastard proposal won’t be easy. The Bells will > argue that the industry is mature. Reality check: it isn’t. … Read more…
1996-02-24 Richard Moore @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 Sender: Brennon Martin <•••@••.•••> Subject: Re: cr> CRISIS in cyber-rights Hi, Not having been in on the formation of cyber-rights, I’m not sure what _exactly_ the mission is/was/will be. I am also uncertain as to what was meant by the desire not to create another discussion … Read more…
1996-02-24 Richard Moore @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Date: Fri, 23 Feb 96 From: Douglas Schuler <•••@••.•••> Subject: Crisis in Cyberland Richard, I received your note from CPSR’s executive director. I appreciate your concern and I too share the urgency of the cyber-rights crisis. It seems that in only a few short weeks, months, or years, this medium will … Read more…
1996-02-24 Richard Moore @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 Sender: “David E. Anderson” <•••@••.•••> Subject: censorship and the mainstream When I read about some conflicts over censorship in schools, I was shocked. Many of the social control extremists objected to the very notion of teaching children to think critically. They wanted to teach “just the … Read more…
1996-02-24 Richard Moore @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 Sender: Lazlo Nibble <•••@••.•••> Subject: cr> Perspectives on censorship > …it seems rather than legislating over the infrastructure as one > entity (e.g. “the Net”) we should consider breaking up standards > according to the degree the service on the network is “public” or > “private.” … Read more…
1996-02-24 Richard Moore @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 Sender: •••@••.••• Subject: Re: CDA and the Fourth Amendment ~–<snip of quoted material>–~ >I realize that litigation on this issue is impossible now as no civil >plaintiff could vicariously raise the rights of a hypothetical criminal >defendant. Nevertheless, enforcement of the Exon and Hyde additions to … Read more…
1996-02-24 Richard Moore @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ From: Henry Huang <•••@••.•••> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 From: “Declan B. McCullagh” <•••@••.•••> To: •••@••.••• Subject: Re: Spin Control Alert (LI Newsday, 2/12/96) ~–<snip>–~ Let’s see who the players are, as identified by Mike Godwin: 1) _The National Coalition for the Protection of Children and … Read more…
1996-02-24 Richard Moore Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 From: “Mark Atkins /ADVISOR L. Fausett” <•••@••.•••> To: •••@••.••• If anyone has any information on these 2 topics, I’d like to have it: 1. Has there EVER been a study ANYWHERE that found some child to have experienced significant psychological disturbance after viewing pornography? 2. Exactly which … Read more…