(re: privacy) The “PROFS Notes” Case [cr-95/11/17]

1995-11-17

Sender: •••@••.•••

Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995
To: •••@••.•••
From: •••@••.••• (Jim Warren)

~--<snip>--~

The "PROFS Notes" Case & Retention of Federal Records

The PROFS Notes case has sought to prevent the destruction of Federal and
Presidential Records and to establish management of Electronic records
consistent with the Federal Records law and Legislative intent. The most
recent posting presents the legal case to stop the National Security
Council from declaring that it is not a Federal Agency and therefore exempt
from provisions of the Federal Records Act.

You can periodically receive breaking news on the case as well as related
issues by subscribing to this list. [Sorry, but I picked this off of
another list -- that did not give the listname for this item.  Have
requested it and will include it in a later GovAccess, if/when I get it.
--jim]

Among the current posting that you will receive are:

1) The Court decision that overturned an agreement between the National
Archives and George Bush that would have allowed the former president to
destroy electronic Federal and Presidential records on computer tapes.

2) The Society of American Archivists Position paper on electronic records.

3) Specification for the Vision of future of the Electronic Record
Preservation Archive.

Send an e-mail message to •••@••.••• with the word Join in the subject
line.
In the body of the message put your name and your E-Mail address as well as
the name of the listserv that from which you saw this notice and any other
comments you wish to make.

-Eddie Becker-    •••@••.•••

~--<snip>--~


 ~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~-~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~
 Posted by Andrew Oram  - •••@••.••• - Moderator: CYBER-RIGHTS (CPSR)
You are encouraged to forward and cross-post messages for non-commercial use,
pursuant to any redistribution restrictions included in individual messages.
 ~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~-~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~